ゼロトラストセキュリティ市場シェア分析、業界動向と統計、成長予測 2026-2031年

ゼロトラストセキュリティ市場の規模は、2025年の417億2,000万米ドルから2026年には484億3,000万米ドルへと拡大し、2026年から2031年にかけて年平均成長率（CAGR）16.07%で推移し、2031年には1,020億1,000万米ドルに達するとMordor Intelligenceでは予測しています。リモートワークの定着、クラウドネイティブ・アーキテクチャの採用、そしてセキュリティ侵害に伴うコストの増大により、組織は境界防御中心のモデルから、あらゆる資産を保護・強化する「継続的な検証」モデルへと移行しています。

2021年の米国大統領令をはじめ、欧州やアジアにおけるデータ保護規制の進化など、規制要件においてもゼロトラストの導入が義務付けられる動きが続いています。また、企業は保護が不十分なAPIを露呈させるM2M（マシン間）通信の急増に直面しており、ランサムウェア被害も事実上あらゆる業界に及んでいます。これに対しベンダー各社は、ID、ネットワーク、エンドポイントの制御機能を統合クラウドプラットフォームに組み込むことで対応しており、単なる製品販売から、成果重視型のサービス提供へと着実にシフトしています。

レポートの主なポイント

• 提供形態別：2025年時点では「ソリューション」が収益シェアの66.55%を占めましたが、2031年までの期間では「サービス」がCAGR 19.05%で成長すると予測されています。
• 導入形態別：2025年の市場シェアでは「オンプレミス」が53.85%を占めましたが、「クラウド」導入はCAGR 19.66%で拡大し、2031年に向けて成長を続けています。
• 組織規模別：2025年の支出額において「大企業」が59.62%を占めましたが、中小企業（SME）もCAGR 18.02%で成長する見込みです。
• 認証方式別：2025年時点では「シングルファクター（単一要素）認証」が53.64%のシェアを維持しましたが、「マルチファクター（多要素）認証」の導入もCAGR 19.78%で増加しています。
• エンドユーザー業界別：2025年時点では「銀行・金融・保険（BFSI）」が23.12%のシェアを占めましたが、成長率の面では「ヘルスケア」分野がCAGR 18.21%と最も高い伸びを示しています。
• 地域別に見ると、北米は2025年の収益の34.72%を占めましたが、アジア太平洋地域は2031年まで年平均成長率（CAGR）18.63%で拡大すると予測されています。

認証タイプ別：多要素認証の拡大が単一要素認証の根強い利用に挑む

パスワード中心のシステムやユーザーエクスペリエンス（UX）への懸念が残る中、単一要素認証は依然として53.64%のシェアを占めています。しかし、侵害に伴うコストの増大や、規制当局による多層的な認証の推奨を背景に、年平均成長率（CAGR）19.78%で拡大する多要素認証の採用が勢いを増しています。

最新のゼロトラスト・プラットフォームは、生体認証、デバイスフィンガープリント、行動分析を組み合わせることで、ユーザーの利便性を損なわない（フリクションレスな）体験を維持しています。こうした技術の融合によりパスワードの優位性は揺らいでおり、ゼロトラスト・セキュリティ市場における単一要素認証のシェアは、2031年にかけて着実に縮小していくと見込まれます。

エンドユーザーの業界別：医療分野の急成長がBFSI（銀行・金融・保険）の優位性に挑む

BFSI分野は、早期導入と厳格な規制対応により、2025年の収益の23.12%を占めました。一方、医療分野では、ランサムウェアが患者データや生命維持に関わる重要システムを標的としていることから、CAGR 18.21%という高い成長率を記録しています。

これに続くのが製造、エネルギー、政府・公共部門であり、これらはOT（運用技術）環境の外部接続拡大が導入を後押ししています。また、小売・Eコマース分野でも、拡大するデジタル店舗のセキュリティを確保するためにゼロトラストが導入されています。こうした業界横断的な動きは、ゼロトラストが単なる小規模な試験的導入の段階を脱し、セキュリティ業界全体において主流のリスク管理標準へと進化したことを裏付けています。

Zero Trust Security Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Zero Trust Security market size is expected to grow from USD 41.72 billion in 2025 to USD 48.43 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 102.01 billion by 2031 at 16.07% CAGR over 2026-2031. Remote work permanence, cloud-native architectures, and escalating breach costs push organizations away from perimeter-centric defenses toward continuous verification models that harden every asset. Regulatory mandates—from the 2021 United States executive order to evolving data-protection rules in Europe and Asia—continue to codify zero trust requirements. Enterprises also confront a surge in machine-to-machine traffic that exposes unsecured APIs, while ransomware incidents now touch virtually every industry segment. Vendors respond by embedding identity, network, and endpoint controls into unified cloud platforms, driving a steady shift from product sales to outcome-based service engagements.

Key Report Takeaways

• By offering, Solutions led with 66.55% revenue share in 2025, yet Services are forecast to advance at a 19.05% CAGR through 2031.
• By deployment mode, On-premise held 53.85% of the zero trust security market share in 2025, while Cloud deployments are expanding at a 19.66% CAGR to 2031.
• By organization size, Large enterprises accounted for 59.62% of spending in 2025; small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are poised to grow at an 18.02% CAGR.
• By authentication type, Single-factor methods retained a 53.64% share in 2025 as multi-factor options increase at a 19.78% CAGR.
• By end-user industry, Banking, financial services, and insurance (BFSI) captured 23.12% share in 2025, whereas Healthcare shows the fastest trajectory at an 18.21% CAGR.
• By geography, North America contributed 34.72% of 2025 revenue, yet Asia-Pacific is projected to climb at a 18.63% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of 2026.

Market Trends and Insights

Drivers Impact Analysis of Zero Trust Security Market*

Increasing number of data breaches
Zero-day vulnerabilities tripled in 2024, and ransomware represented one-third of all breaches across 92% of industries. [1] Human factors contributed to 68% of incidents, pressing enterprises to adopt continuous verification that assumes internal compromise. Third-party weaknesses climbed 68%, forcing organizations to extend zero trust principles to suppliers. Insider threats cost financial institutions USD 16.2 million per event on average. Breach economics, therefore, favor preventative spending on zero trust controls over expensive post-incident remediation.

Expansion of remote/hybrid workforces
Permanent remote work invalidates VPN-centric access. Organizations that adopted zero trust architectures saw an 83% cut in incident-response times and an 80% drop in successful breaches. NTT DATA’s rollout connected 50,000 users in 30 days, proving cloud-delivered scalability. Remote Browser Isolation tools further protect distributed staff without hindering productivity, fueling sustained demand for zero-trust network access.

Rising regulatory mandates
The U.S. executive order obliges all federal agencies to transition to zero trust, spurring private-sector copycat programs. PCI DSS updates in finance and HIPAA refinements in healthcare promote continuous verification over perimeter checks. Supply-chain security laws increasingly require vendors to prove zero trust compliance, favoring integrated platforms that simplify audit evidence.

Explosion of machine and API traffic
API calls now outnumber human web requests, exposing unattended endpoints. Platforms embed AI to profile real-time traffic and flag anomalies. Akamai’s 2024 acquisitions of Neosec and Noname Security underscored growing demand for API-centric defenses. [2] Manufacturers use zero-trust micro-segmentation to shield industrial IoT devices, maintaining uptime while limiting lateral movement.

Restraints Impact Analysis of Zero Trust Security Market*

Legacy integration hurdles
Decades-old applications often lack modern authentication hooks, forcing custom connectors that extend deployment schedules. Healthcare facilities struggle to retrofit network-enabled medical devices built without security in mind. [3] Manufacturers face similar constraints with operational technology, where uptime trumps security. Vendors that package pre-configured integrations ease friction and shorten project payback.

High up-front architecture cost
Comprehensive zero-trust programs require identity orchestration, network segmentation, and automated policy engines. Capital intensity can deter SMEs, even though a single breach routinely eclipses initial spending. Subscription-based cloud services mitigate capital hurdles, enabling pay-as-you-go adoption. Still, organizations must weigh deployment scope against resource limits, reinforcing the value of managed service offerings that bundle technology and expertise.

*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.

Zero Trust Security Market Segment Analysis

By Offering:Services Surge Despite Solutions Dominance
Solutions accounted for 66.55% of 2025 revenue, anchoring the zero trust security market through integrated policy engines and analytics dashboards. However, services are rising at a 19.05% CAGR as enterprises rely on partners to design, deploy, and fine-tune architectures across hybrid landscapes.

Professional services guide strategy, while managed offerings deliver continuous optimization without ballooning headcount. High-profile rollouts—such as Cimpress transforming global access controls—underline the organizational change management needed alongside technology shifts, explaining why the zero trust security market continues to pivot toward service-led value delivery.

By Deployment Mode:Cloud Acceleration Challenges On-Premise Dominance
On-premise solutions preserved 53.85% of 2025 spending, reflecting regulated workloads that remain inside corporate data centers. Cloud deployments, growing at 19.66% CAGR, attract firms seeking instant scalability and simplified updates.

Hybrid patterns dominate: sensitive data stays on-site while SaaS gateways manage identity and policy logic. As compliance frameworks evolve to recognize cloud residency controls, the zero trust security market size attached to cloud models is expected to expand rapidly, narrowing the on-premise lead over the forecast period.

By Organisation Size:SME Adoption Accelerates Despite Enterprise Dominance
Large enterprises captured 59.62% of outlays in 2025, leveraging budgets to build bespoke zero-trust blueprints. SMEs, advancing at an 18.02% CAGR, increasingly consume right-sized SaaS bundles that collapse identity, network, and endpoint security into a single pane.

Cost-distributed subscriptions flatten entry barriers, letting smaller firms enjoy enterprise-grade protection. Vendors that automate policy creation and furnish 24×7 SOC oversight resonate strongly with resource-constrained buyers, reinforcing growth momentum within this segment of the zero trust security market.

By Authentication Type:Multi-Factor Growth Challenges Single-Factor Persistence
Single-factor approaches still hold a 53.64% share, a legacy of password-centric systems and user-experience fears. Multi-factor usage, expanding at 19.78% CAGR, gains traction as breach costs climb and regulators advocate layered checks.

Modern zero trust platforms weave biometrics, device fingerprinting, and behavior analytics to maintain frictionless experiences. This convergence is shrinking the password stronghold, indicating that the zero trust security market share of single-factor methods will erode steadily through 2031.

By End-user Industry:Healthcare Acceleration Challenges BFSI Leadership
BFSI owned 23.12% of 2025 revenue thanks to early adoption and strict oversight. Healthcare is pacing an 18.21% CAGR as ransomware targets patient data and life-critical systems.

Manufacturing, energy, and government follow, driven by operational technology exposure. Retail and e-commerce deploy zero trust to secure expanding digital storefronts. Cross-industry momentum confirms that zero trust has progressed from niche pilot to mainstream risk-management standard across the zero trust security industry.

Complete Report Scope:

• By Offering
  • Solutions
  • Services
• By Deployment Mode
  • On-premise
  • Cloud
• By Organisation Size
  • Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
  • Large Enterprises
• By Authentication Type
  • Single-Factor
  • Multi-Factor
• By End-user Industry
  • IT and Telecom
  • BFSI
  • Manufacturing
  • Healthcare
  • Energy and Utilities
  • Retail and E-commerce
  • Government and Defense
  • Other End-user Industries
• By Geography
  • North America
    • United States
    • Canada
    • Mexico
  • South America
    • Brazil
    • Argentina
    • Chile
    • Rest of South America
  • Europe
    • Germany
    • United Kingdom
    • France
    • Italy
    • Spain
    • Russia
    • Rest of Europe
  • Asia-Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • South Korea
    • Australia
    • Singapore
    • Malaysia
    • Rest of Asia-Pacific
  • Middle East and Africa
    • Middle East
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Saudi Arabia
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Africa

Geography Analysis

North America Zero Trust Security Market
North America secured 34.72% of 2025 revenue through mature regulations, extensive cloud adoption, and vendor density. Federal mandates push agencies and contractors toward consistent architectures, while financial hubs in New York and Toronto showcase reference deployments that ripple across other verticals. Competitive pressure, however, is intensifying as newer cloud-native entrants challenge incumbents on price and automation.

APAC Zero Trust Security Market
Asia-Pacific commands the fastest CAGR at 18.63% to 2031. Governments from Singapore to Japan enact cybersecurity roadmaps that embed zero trust principles, letting firms leapfrog legacy firewalls in favor of cloud-delivered controls. Manufacturing clusters rely on micro-segmentation to protect converged IT/OT environments, further expanding the zero-trust security market in the region.

EMEA Zero Trust Security Market
Europe’s steady progression stems from GDPR and sector-specific directives that favor privacy-preserving architectures. Vendors that provide granular audit trails and EU-based data centers gain traction. Meanwhile, the Middle East and Africa register emerging potential as digital governments fund modernization, though adoption still lags due to limited local skill sets and infrastructure.

Regulatory Landscape

Zero trust has shifted from recommended practice to formal compliance and procurement gating across key jurisdictions. In the United States, Executive Order 14028 is operationalized through OMB Memorandum M-22-09, which sets federal zero trust objectives and has been reinforced via subsequent memos extending maturation through FY 2026. CISA also published its Zero Trust Architecture Implementation report (January 2025) to align agency progress with the federal maturity model.

In Europe, Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2) entered into force in January 2023 and required national transposition by October 17, 2024, which raised baseline risk-management controls tied to continuous authentication, access governance, and segmentation capabilities. In January 2026, the European Commission advanced a proposal (2026/0012(COD)) for targeted amendments impacting NIS2 and the EU Cybersecurity Act, signaling further standardization and added policy focus on long-term crypto-agility (including post-quantum considerations) that shapes identity, access, and trust architecture roadmaps.

Value Chain Analysis

The zero trust security value chain begins with standards and reference architectures that shape requirements and interoperability, then moves to core technology suppliers such as identity and access management, endpoint security, network security and segmentation, policy engines, analytics, and API security. Platform vendors package these capabilities as suites, and downstream, systems integrators, cloud service providers, and managed security service providers design and operate deployments for enterprises and public-sector buyers, typically distributed through cloud marketplaces, channel partners, and direct enterprise sales.

Implementation and assurance activities are increasingly influenced by government-authored guidance that reduces integration friction and de-risks procurement. NIST SP 1800-35 (June 2025) provides 19 example implementations aligned with NIST SP 800-207, while CISA guidance extends zero trust principles into operational technology environments (April 2026). Software supply-chain transparency is also becoming a visible dependency across the chain, supported by joint SBOM guidance released by CISA, NSA, and international partners (September 2025), which raises expectations for vendor attestations, dependency visibility, and audit-ready evidence across integrated zero trust stacks.

Competitive Landscape

The zero trust security market hosts a blend of platform giants and agile specialists. Palo Alto Networks, Cisco, and Fortinet layer identity, network, and endpoint controls into consolidated suites. Zscaler processes more than half a trillion daily transactions through its cloud-native Zero Trust Exchange, reinforcing scale advantages.

Strategic moves illustrate consolidation: Arista integrated zero-trust features into CloudVision for automated network segmentation. Akamai absorbed Neosec and Noname Security to fortify API protection. Veeam and Microsoft co-developed AI-powered resilience aligned with zero-trust tenets.

Innovation centers on AI-driven behavior scoring; Cloudflare’s recent patent for multi-domain application mapping exemplifies the focus on automated policy decisions. Emerging players such as Zero Networks advance automated micro-segmentation that installs in minutes, winning mindshare among resource-strained teams. [4] The competitive narrative, therefore, pivots on speed, automation, and breadth of ecosystem integrations rather than on standalone feature depth.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Public-sector programs are continuing to produce deployment runbooks that commercial buyers reuse, creating near-term demand for packaged implementations, managed services, and audit-evidence automation. The revised Federal Zero Trust Data Security Guide (CIO.gov, May 2025) and the Department of Defense Directive-Type Memorandum 25-003 (July 2025), which establishes a Zero Trust Portfolio Management Office and a Chief Zero Trust Officer role, also formalize cross-domain coordination and procurement alignment.

A second opportunity area centers on interoperability-led adoption. Buyers increasingly prefer architectures that map to accepted maturity models and reference builds rather than bespoke designs. NIST SP 1800-35 (June 2025) offers 19 commercially built example implementations with industry collaborators, and the National Security Agency published a Zero Trust Implementation Guidelines (ZIGs) Primer for National Security Systems (January 2026). Together, these anchors reinforce demand for modular, standards-aligned identity, segmentation, and policy enforcement, and they also surface adjacent needs such as continuous control validation, data-centric policy mapping, and operationalization for IT/OT environments, supported by CISA guidance on adapting zero trust principles to operational technology (April 2026).

Recent Industry Developments in Zero Trust Security Market

• July 2026: Palo Alto Networks announced general availability of Prisma AIRS AI Gateway. The update extends zero trust controls into AI usage by centralizing policy, inspection, and governance for AI interactions, moving platform roadmaps beyond users and devices toward agentic workflows.
• June 2026: Zscaler unveiled new product innovations to secure agentic AI, including capabilities such as an AI Access Graph and updates tied to its Zero Trust Exchange. This broadens zero trust from connectivity and access decisions into visibility and control for AI-driven data flows and identities across cloud applications and services.
• May 2025: Veeam and Microsoft expanded their collaboration to launch AI-enabled data-resilience services aligned with zero-trust principles. The announcement links zero trust access controls with recovery-oriented cyber resilience, supporting enterprise programs that pair continuous verification with hardened backup and restoration workflows.

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

• Palo Alto Networks Inc.
• Cisco Systems Inc.
• Zscaler Inc.
• Okta Inc.
• Fortinet Inc.
• CrowdStrike Holdings Inc.
• Check Point Software Tech.
• IBM Corporation
• Akamai Technologies Inc.
• Illumio Inc.
• Appgate Inc.
• Netskope Inc.
• Cloudflare Inc.
• Duo Security LLC
• BeyondTrust Corp.
• CyberArk Software Ltd.
• Ping Identity Corp.
• SailPoint Technologies
• One Identity LLC
• Banyan Security Inc.
• Zero Networks Ltd.
• Elisity Inc.
• Versa Networks Inc.
• Vectra AI Inc.
• Guardicore Ltd. (Cisco Networks)

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Increasing number of data breaches
4.2.2 Expansion of remote/hybrid workforces
4.2.3 Rising regulatory mandates
4.2.4 Explosion of machine and API traffic
4.2.5 Smart-NIC micro-segmentation
4.2.6 Identity-network convergence
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 Legacy integration hurdles
4.3.2 High up-front architecture cost
4.3.3 Shadow-IT SaaS bypass
4.3.4 Supplier data-sharing clauses
4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Landscape
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Industry Attractiveness – Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
4.8 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUES)
5.1 By Offering
5.1.1 Solutions
5.1.2 Services
5.2 By Deployment Mode
5.2.1 On-premise
5.2.2 Cloud
5.3 By Organisation Size
5.3.1 Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
5.3.2 Large Enterprises
5.4 By Authentication Type
5.4.1 Single-Factor
5.4.2 Multi-Factor
5.5 By End-user Industry
5.5.1 IT and Telecom
5.5.2 BFSI
5.5.3 Manufacturing
5.5.4 Healthcare
5.5.5 Energy and Utilities
5.5.6 Retail and E-commerce
5.5.7 Government and Defense
5.5.8 Other End-user Industries
5.6 By Geography
5.6.1 North America
5.6.1.1 United States
5.6.1.2 Canada
5.6.1.3 Mexico
5.6.2 South America
5.6.2.1 Brazil
5.6.2.2 Argentina
5.6.2.3 Chile
5.6.2.4 Rest of South America
5.6.3 Europe
5.6.3.1 Germany
5.6.3.2 United Kingdom
5.6.3.3 France
5.6.3.4 Italy
5.6.3.5 Spain
5.6.3.6 Russia
5.6.3.7 Rest of Europe
5.6.4 Asia-Pacific
5.6.4.1 China
5.6.4.2 India
5.6.4.3 Japan
5.6.4.4 South Korea
5.6.4.5 Australia
5.6.4.6 Singapore
5.6.4.7 Malaysia
5.6.4.8 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
5.6.5.1 Middle East
5.6.5.1.1 United Arab Emirates
5.6.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
5.6.5.1.3 Turkey
5.6.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
5.6.5.2 Africa
5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
5.6.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.6.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Palo Alto Networks Inc.
6.4.2 Cisco Systems Inc.
6.4.3 Zscaler Inc.
6.4.4 Okta Inc.
6.4.5 Fortinet Inc.
6.4.6 CrowdStrike Holdings Inc.
6.4.7 Check Point Software Tech.
6.4.8 IBM Corporation
6.4.9 Akamai Technologies Inc.
6.4.10 Illumio Inc.
6.4.11 Appgate Inc.
6.4.12 Netskope Inc.
6.4.13 Cloudflare Inc.
6.4.14 Duo Security LLC
6.4.15 BeyondTrust Corp.
6.4.16 CyberArk Software Ltd.
6.4.17 Ping Identity Corp.
6.4.18 SailPoint Technologies
6.4.19 One Identity LLC
6.4.20 Banyan Security Inc.
6.4.21 Zero Networks Ltd.
6.4.22 Elisity Inc.
6.4.23 Versa Networks Inc.
6.4.24 Vectra AI Inc.
6.4.25 Guardicore Ltd. (Cisco Networks)

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE TRENDS
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

---

---