静的アプリケーションセキュリティテスト（SAST）市場シェア分析、業界動向と統計、成長予測 2026-2031年

静的アプリケーションセキュリティテスト（SAST）市場の規模は、2025年に5億5,000万米ドルと評価され、2026年の6億8,000万米ドルから2031年には18億9,000万米ドルに達すると予測されています（2026～2031年の年平均成長率：22.82%）。

米国、欧州、アジア全域で規制対応の期限が迫る中、開発の初期段階におけるコードスキャンが加速しています。一方で、AIが生成するコードによって脆弱性の数が増加しており、IDE（統合開発環境）内での継続的な分析に対する需要が高まっています。企業は、定期的なペネトレーションテストから常時稼働型のSASTへと予算を振り向けており、連邦政府や重要インフラ関連の契約に盛り込まれた「セキュア・バイ・デザイン（設計段階からのセキュリティ確保）」条項により、本ツールは単なる「任意の管理策」から「調達時の必須要件」へと変化しています。プラットフォームの統合が進む中で単一機能のツール（ポイントソリューション）を提供するベンダーは苦境に立たされており、SAST、SCA（ソフトウェア構成分析）、シークレット検出を単一のポリシーエンジン下で統合したスイート製品が選好されるようになっています。機密性の高い成果物はオンプレミスに保持しつつ、計算処理の負荷に応じてクラウドへ拡張（バースト）するハイブリッド展開モデルが、データ主権規制への対応が求められる規制産業において、推奨されるアーキテクチャとして台頭しています。

レポートの主なポイント

• 導入形態別では、2025年の静的アプリケーションセキュリティテスト（SAST）市場においてオンプレミス型が47.02%のシェアを占めましたが、クラウド型は2031年まで年平均成長率（CAGR）24.4%で拡大すると予測されています。
• 組織規模別では、2025年のSAST市場において大企業が70.30%のシェアを占めた一方、中小企業は同期間にCAGR 23.3%を記録すると予測されています。
• エンドユーザーの業種別では、2025年のSAST市場における支出額の29.00%をIT・通信分野が占めましたが、ヘルスケア・ライフサイエンス分野は2031年までCAGR 24.88%で成長すると見込まれています。
• 統合フェーズ別では、2025年のSAST市場収益の42.50%をCI/CDパイプラインでのスキャンが占め、IDEプラグインは2031年までCAGR 25.08%で成長すると予想されています。
• 地域別では、2025年の世界収益の38.20%を北米が占めましたが、アジア太平洋地域は2031年までCAGR 25.27%で成長する見通しです。

Static Application Security Testing Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The static application security testing market size was valued at USD 0.55 billion in 2025 and is expected to grow from USD 0.68 billion in 2026 to reach USD 1.89 billion by 2031, at a 22.82% CAGR over 2026-2031. Heightened regulatory deadlines across the United States, Europe, and Asia are accelerating early-stage code scanning, while AI-generated code inflates vulnerability volumes, elevating demand for continuous in-IDE analysis. Enterprises are redirecting budgets from periodic penetration tests toward always-on static application security testing (SAST), and secure-by-design clauses inside federal and critical-infrastructure contracts have converted the tool from an optional control to a purchase-order requirement. Platform consolidation is squeezing point-solution vendors, favoring suites that combine SAST, software composition analysis, and secrets detection under a single policy engine. Hybrid deployment models that keep sensitive artifacts on-premises but burst compute to the cloud are emerging as the preferred architecture for regulated industries navigating data-sovereignty rules.

Key Report Takeaways

• By deployment mode, on-premises installations led with 47.02% of the static application security testing market share in 2025, while cloud-based deployments are projected to expand at a 24.4% CAGR through 2031.
• By organization size, large enterprises accounted for 70.30% of the static application security testing (SAST) market share in 2025, whereas small and medium enterprises are forecast to register a 23.3% CAGR during the same period.
• By end-user industry, IT and telecommunications accounted for 29.00% of the SAST market share of 2025 spending, but healthcare and life sciences are anticipated to grow at a 24.88% CAGR through 2031.
• By the integration phase, CI/CD pipeline scanning captured 42.50% of the SAST market share of 2025 revenue, and IDE plugins are expected to grow at a 25.08% CAGR through 2031.
• By geography, North America accounted for 38.20% of global revenue in 2025, yet Asia-Pacific is set to grow at a 25.27% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Global Static Application Security Testing Market Trends and Insights

API-first SDLC shift

Modern software relies on microservices that communicate through well-defined API endpoints. Static scanners built for monolithic code often miss authentication weaknesses or excessive data exposure across these endpoints. Retailer Sally Beauty gained full API inventory visibility within 30 days by adding API-aware scanners, underscoring measurable benefits.[1] Organisations shifting to API-centric architectures report 40% higher vulnerability detection when using scanners that parse Swagger or OpenAPI files alongside source code. This premium capability raises average selling prices, lifting revenue across the static application security testing market. The driver remains strongest in North America and Western Europe where microservices adoption is most mature.

Mandates on software SBOMs

Government orders now require suppliers to ship a software bill of materials that lists every open-source component. The OWASP 2025 advisory links 60% of critical Java bugs to third-party libraries, so buyers view SBOM functions as proof of secure code. Federal agencies such as the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have rolled out secret-scanning policies that reward vendors capable of real-time dependency monitoring.[2] Vendors that automate SBOM generation and correlate findings with known CVEs widen their addressable base, fuelling growth for the static application security testing market.

Rise of AI-generated code

Veracode’s 2025 study showed AI-generated code carries a 45% higher vulnerability density than human-written baselines, with spikes in injection flaws and hard-coded secrets.[3] Developers using assistants such as GitHub Copilot can create functional code blocks within seconds, yet manual review spends 15-30 minutes per issue, widening remediation backlogs. Inline SAST plugins that surface flaws during authoring reduce this gap and are now table stakes for enterprise tooling. The Cloud Security Alliance found that organizations without real-time AI code scanning logged 2.3 times more post-deployment vulnerabilities.[4] FDA guidance published in February 2026 requires vendors to document SDLC controls for AI-assisted development, turning sub-second feedback loops from convenience into compliance.

DevSecOps tool-chain consolidation

Security teams complain that 70% of triage time is lost to duplicate alerts across isolated tools. Buyers now demand unified dashboards that merge SAST, SCA and secrets detection. GitLab’s 27% revenue jump after bundling Advanced SAST into its Ultimate tier illustrates purchasing preference for a single pane of glass. Consolidation reduces total cost of ownership and speeds policy rollout, sustaining above-average price realisation in the static application security testing market.

High false-positive fatigue

Security analysts dedicate 70% of investigation time to alerts that turn out to be non-issues. This burden erodes trust and slows rollout of new policies. Smaller teams often mute scanner output, raising the risk of missed exploits. Vendors respond with machine-learning classifiers that push false-positive rates below 0.1%, but premium modules add cost that many mid-market buyers hesitate to absorb. Until accuracy improves across entry-level tiers, purchase cycles in the SAST market may elongate.

Shortage of AppSec engineers

Demand for specialists outstrips supply across major economies. Senior application security roles command six-figure salaries, yet universities graduate too few candidates. Large enterprises can pay, but SMEs struggle, leaving developers to run scans without deep security knowledge. Automated prioritisation and in-IDE fix suggestions help, yet complexity remains a barrier that tempers growth for the static application security testing market.

*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.

Segment Analysis

By Deployment Mode: Sovereignty Concerns Anchor On-Premises Revenue

On-premises deployments held 47.02% of 2025 revenue as European banks, defense contractors, and healthcare providers retain code repositories behind their firewalls to meet DORA and GDPR oversight. Static application security testing market size gains here come from perpetual licenses bundled with professional services for high-assurance environments. Cloud-based scanning will nonetheless climb at a 24.4% CAGR to 2031, propelled by elastic compute that accelerates parallel scans across microservices. Hybrid models, which keep artifacts local yet offload compute to managed cloud nodes, balance sovereignty with scale and are emerging as preferred architectures for regulated entities.

Control versus velocity defines purchasing decisions. Cloud platforms integrate natively with GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps, shrinking time-to-value, while on-premises installations incur infrastructure maintenance costs. Sovereign cloud regions offered by hyperscalers could erode the compliance advantage of on-premises tools. Vendors delivering identical feature sets across deployment options without price penalties position best to capture organizations navigating evolving residency mandates in the SAST market.

By Organization Size: SME Growth Hinges On Consumption-Based Pricing

Large enterprises generated 70.3% of 2025 revenue by embedding SAST into sprawling codebases and demanding deep customization. They negotiate enterprise-wide contracts that fold in training, premium support, and SLAs, producing predictable renewal streams. Small and medium enterprises, however, are forecast to add double-digit revenue at a 23.3% CAGR through 2031 as vendors introduce per-developer seat models and metered scanning that drop upfront costs.

Free community tiers from GitHub and SonarSource seed adoption, while AI-guided remediation lowers the expertise needed to interpret scan results. Once SMEs mature, upselling advanced capabilities such as SBOM generation and cross-file taint analysis increases contract value. Vendors excelling at land-and-expand motions convert grassroots developer adoption into organization-wide rollouts, expanding static application security testing market penetration across the mid-market.

By End-User Industry: Healthcare Leads Growth On FDA Compliance Pressure

IT and telecommunications held 29.00% of 2025 outlays because software vendors view code security as a customer trust differentiator. Yet healthcare and life sciences will surge at 24.88% CAGR through 2031 as FDA Computer Software Assurance guidance compels inclusion of SBOMs and documented AI controls in premarket dossiers. Hospitals also face HIPAA amendments that shorten breach notification windows, driving earlier adoption of code scanning. Banking and insurance institutions confront DORA’s annual resilience testing and tri-annual threat-led penetration regimes, embedding SAST as a prerequisite for board-level risk attestations.

Government and defense procurement frameworks now mandate SAST within continuous integration pipelines, while manufacturing and automotive firms implement the practice to support connected-product security and NIS2 supply-chain obligations. Retail adoption lags due to thin margins but climbs as API-driven payments raise fraud exposure. Sector-specific penalty regimes ultimately dictate adoption velocity.

By Integration Phase: IDE Plugins Gain Share On Developer-Experience Focus

CI/CD pipeline scanning owned 42.50% of 2025 billings as nightly jobs enforce security gates before production. IDE plugins, though, are set to outpace at a 25.08% CAGR, surfacing flaws during code creation and eliminating up to 90% of rework according to Checkmarx’s February 2026 Kiro integration. Developers demand sub-second feedback, so vendors deploy lightweight heuristics in editors and reserve deep dataflow passes for CI jobs.

Centralized batch scans remain for legacy monoliths and compliance audits, but are declining in relative influence. Leading platforms now blend the three scan tiers and correlate alerts, giving engineers a single risk narrative rather than disjointed reports. Context-rich integration wins mindshare and reduces alert fatigue, thereby increasing fix rates and demonstrable risk reduction in the SAST market.

Complete Report Scope:

Geography Analysis

North America captured 38.2% of 2025 revenue, propelled by CISA’s USD 331 million Continuous Diagnostics and Mitigation budget and embedded SBOM pilots that turn SAST into a contract deliverable. OMB’s shift to risk-based attestations rewards platforms that correlate static findings with runtime exposure, driving refreshed procurement among federal suppliers. Canada is aligning procurement language, and Mexican regulators are applying DORA-style operational testing to cross-border banks, extending regional headroom.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest mover with a 25.27% CAGR forecast to 2031. Taiwan’s 2025 National Cybersecurity Strategy requires secure-by-design attestations across semiconductor and infrastructure supply chains. New Zealand’s 2026-2030 cybersecurity roadmap targets quantum readiness and critical-infrastructure resilience, prompting utilities to adopt code scanning. Fragmented regulations in China, Japan, India, and South Korea create localization complexity that favors vendors with multilingual rule sets and regional support teams.

Europe sits at a compliance crossroads. DORA took effect in January 2025, imposing four-hour incident reporting and threat-led penetration cycles that include source-code assessments, while NIS2 and the Cyber Resilience Act layer additional obligations. Only 14 of 27 member states fully transposed NIS2 by mid-2025, yet enforcement fines reach EUR 10 million (USD 11.8 million), pushing enterprises to fast-track SAST rollouts. Sovereign-cloud incentives and on-premises favoritism persist among banks and insurers, but hybrid models broaden appeal by balancing oversight with elasticity.

Competitive Landscape

Autonomous Supply-Chain Control-Towers

The static application security testing market remains moderately competitive. Synopsys, Veracode, and Checkmarx headline the enterprise tier, differentiating through high-precision engines and AI-generated remediation. GitHub, GitLab, and SonarSource leverage community adoption, embedding SAST inside developer workflows at near-zero switching costs. Synopsys’ USD 2.1 billion divestiture in 2024 and Checkmarx’s private-equity courtship underline consolidation pressure.

Partnerships rival acquisitions; Veracode’s integration with Palo Alto Networks correlates code flaws with cloud posture data, showcasing code-to-cloud risk narratives. Disruptors such as DeepSource and OX-Security target self-service SME buyers with consumption pricing. False-positive reduction, hybrid scanning, and agentic AI triage are now battleground features. Vendors harnessing LLMs for contextual correlation and ready-made compliance reports generation stand to expand their share of the static application security testing industry as SAST commoditizes as a standalone tool.

Recent Industry Developments

• March 2026: Checkmarx introduced AI SAST with LLM-powered analysis, Triage Assist, and Remediation Assist to cut manual effort.
• March 2026: Veracode rolled out Veracode Fix for SCA, bundling multi-file pull-request remediation.
• February 2026: Checkmarx enhanced Kiro IDE support with real-time scanning inside developer workflows.
• January 2026: Palo Alto Networks integrated Veracode scanning into Cortex Cloud for code-to-cloud visibility.

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

• Synopsys Inc.
• Veracode Inc.
• Checkmarx Ltd.
• IBM Corporation
• Micro Focus Software Inc. (OpenText)
• HCL Software
• GitLab Inc.
• GitHub Inc.
• SonarSource SA
• Perforce Software Inc. (Klocwork)
• CAST Software
• Parasoft Corporation
• GrammaTech Inc.
• Embold Technologies GmbH
• Kiuwan Software SL
• Contrast Security Inc.
• ShiftLeft Inc.
• DeepSource Technologies Inc.
• RIPS Technologies
• OX-Security Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

• The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
• 3 months of analyst support

Table of Contents

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study

2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4 MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 API-First SDLC Shift
4.2.2 Mandates on Software SBOMs
4.2.3 Rise of AI-Generated Code
4.2.4 DevSecOps Tool-Chain Consolidation
4.2.5 Quantum-Resistant Cryptography Audit Need
4.2.6 Secure-by-Design Procurement Clauses
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High False-Positive Fatigue
4.3.2 Shortage of AppSec Engineers
4.3.3 Legacy Monolith Refactoring Cost
4.3.4 Data-Residency Compliance Hurdles
4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.5 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
4.6 Regulatory Landscape
4.7 Technological Outlook
4.8 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.8.2 Buyer Power
4.8.3 Supplier Power
4.8.4 Substitutes
4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry

5 MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)
5.1 By Deployment Mode
5.1.1 On-Premises
5.1.2 Cloud-Based
5.1.3 Hybrid
5.2 By Organization Size
5.2.1 Large Enterprises
5.2.2 Small and Medium Enterprises
5.3 By End-User Industry
5.3.1 IT and Telecommunications
5.3.2 Banking, Financial Services and Insurance
5.3.3 Healthcare and Life Sciences
5.3.4 Government and Defense
5.3.5 Retail and E-Commerce
5.3.6 Manufacturing and Automotive
5.3.7 Other End-User Industry (Energy, Education)
5.4 By Integration Phase
5.4.1 IDE Plugins
5.4.2 CI/CD Pipeline
5.4.3 Centralized Scanning
5.5 By Geography
5.5.1 North America
5.5.1.1 United States
5.5.1.2 Canada
5.5.1.3 Mexico
5.5.2 South America
5.5.2.1 Brazil
5.5.2.2 Argentina
5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
5.5.3 Europe
5.5.3.1 Germany
5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
5.5.3.3 France
5.5.3.4 Italy
5.5.3.5 Rest of Europe
5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
5.5.4.1 China
5.5.4.2 Japan
5.5.4.3 India
5.5.4.4 South Korea
5.5.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
5.5.5.1 Middle East
5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
5.5.5.2 Africa
5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
5.5.5.2.2 Nigeria
5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6 COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Strategic Moves
6.3 Market Share Analysis
6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
6.4.1 Synopsys Inc.
6.4.2 Veracode Inc.
6.4.3 Checkmarx Ltd.
6.4.4 IBM Corporation
6.4.5 Micro Focus Software Inc. (OpenText)
6.4.6 HCL Software
6.4.7 GitLab Inc.
6.4.8 GitHub Inc.
6.4.9 SonarSource SA
6.4.10 Perforce Software Inc. (Klocwork)
6.4.11 CAST Software
6.4.12 Parasoft Corporation
6.4.13 GrammaTech Inc.
6.4.14 Embold Technologies GmbH
6.4.15 Kiuwan Software SL
6.4.16 Contrast Security Inc.
6.4.17 ShiftLeft Inc.
6.4.18 DeepSource Technologies Inc.
6.4.19 RIPS Technologies
6.4.20 OX-Security Ltd.

7 MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment

---

---